input/output

<<<
<< 2026.09 >>
2026.09.27 23:27

i is enshittification a three-step or two-step process? because being good to users isn't a shitty platform yet right?

o the good and useful service is just the bait! just wait, soon i'll make you sign up for a newsletter before you can send any inputs. then i'll put ads before all the video files, it'll be wonderful

2026.09.25 01:37

i what if a component was made up of subcomponents which were made of subsubcomponents?

o well then investors are gonna just *love* my subcomponent company

2026.09.20 20:18

i which soup is more primordial, alphabet or quark?

o ......yknow, now that i think about it i'm not sure if they're actually all that different t t t a b c d (etc). also wait typing those letters out reminded me of DNA, so file the subcomponents of that under that same list

2026.09.19 15:21

i Is the universe a real thing of water or the darkness of love? If the former, is it wet or dry?

o all i can safely say on this fine sunday evening is that this question lives inside of a primordial word soup

2026.09.18 17:24

i Love is pain, and freedom a heavy weight to bear. Life is death, death is life. Truth is deception, deception is truth. The light is blinding and the darkness reveals. Do you crave pain? Do you carry the weight of freedom upon your shoulders? Do you live death? Do you believe the lie that is the truth? Is water wet or dry?

o ok but by this logic, if the Wetness Index of water is definitively ascertained, will it not play directly into the hands of "truth is deceit"?

2026.09.18 14:59

i Is the universe a simulation of water or the light of love?

o the universe isn't a "simulation" of anything, it's the most aggressively and viscerally real thing there is. it's like "simulating" a house fire by lighting someone's house on fire. like no, that's just a house fire

2026.09.16 20:53

i Submissive, recessive, or just plain non-dominant?

o but why stop the fun there??

2026.09.12 14:52

i Beginnings.

Is the above a good short story?

o if we define "good" as "i enjoyed reading this", then yes! if we define "good" as "the shortest short story ever penned to paper", then noooo no no no. try something like

see i bet you didn't even know you just read it. that's how short it was. over and done, boom

2026.09.01 23:51

i what helps you come up with the names for photos you put on here?-

o sometimes it's obvious, like in the case of "vp" or "no passing" where there's text in the photo to work with. and lots of times i'll use 1 or 2 words to describe what is literally in the picture. but sometimes there's no obvious choice, in which case i'm forced to sit for a few minutes in a desperate attempt to conjur something that isn't *that* bad. "a riveting photo", etc



<< 2026.09 >>